EASA Compliant Flight Data Monitoring – What Actions are usually taken from the Cumulative Event Data

Posted by on
  • Hits: 2781

Operational Flight Data Monitoring, known more recently as Flight Operational Quality Assurance (FOQA), is probably the most important safety tool available to aviation.

Rather than reacting to serious incidents, operators have a very useful tool to proactively identify safety hazards and mitigate the risks.

What Happens to Identified Events?

Whilst each event typically needs to be investigated so that the appropriate management decisions may be made by the airline, there is an opportunity for a deeper and longer-lasting outcome.

Event data may be managed to facilitate the wider and longer-term trend analysis so that events & issues can be identified and corrective action is taken.

Considering Normal OPS!

Analysts can also analyse the collected data from normal operations to enable the opportunity to identify trends before there is a significant event or incident.

(Both approaches to analysis can work together to give the safety officer a greater insight into what is happening within the organisation.)

Initial Verification of Flight Data is the First Step

The first step in the investigation process is to ensure the information is realistic and presents a consistent picture.

VALIDATION IS CRITICAL. Before any action is instigated the basic FDR information must be thoroughly checked. Well-written FDM software should automate as much of this process as practical.

Identification of Urgent Actions

A small number of circumstances may be derived from FDM data which indicate that immediate safety action is required and a fast procedure to ensure safety-critical remedial action should be defined. An example could be a heavy landing with potential damage that has not been reported by other means.

This should trigger actions to generate a maintenance requirement for relevant Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) structural checks as soon as possible.

Continued Monitoring

Once any action is taken a record should be generated to ensure an active monitor is enabled.

This should be identified against the original problem and a careful assessment made of other potential hazards in the area of change.

Note – Part of the assessment of the fuller effects of changes should be an attempt to identify potential relocation of risks.

This follow-up activity, together with a general monitoring of all surrounding measures is required before “signing off” the change as successful. This confirmation, or otherwise, would be expected to feed into a high-level management group to ensure remedial action takes place.

Have questions about our programs, need more information, or want to learn about our exclusive special offers? We’re here to help! Reach out to us at team@sassofia.com, and one of our friendly experts will get back to you promptly. Let us guide you in finding the perfect training solution tailored to your needs!
 

 

Rate this blog entry:
0